An anonymous author has published a lengthy document, titled “The Rollbit Files,” alleging that the crypto casino Rollbit is operated by individuals with a history of deceptive gambling practices, and accusing the platform of systematically seizing user funds under shifting, after-the-fact justifications. The author describes themselves as a former Rollbit user who says they lost money on the platform and subsequently spent roughly a year investigating the company, saying they have faced “threats of legal action” and coordinated efforts to remove earlier versions of the research.
Who Is Behind Rollbit
Rollbit is publicly fronted by two pseudonymous co-founders, “Razer” and “Lucky,” and states it is operated by Bull Gaming N.V., a company registered in Curaçao. The document claims “Lucky” is Daniel Robert Dixon, a British national, based on statements attributed to other figures in the online gambling industry and UK Companies House records showing Dixon as director and majority shareholder of:
- DAX Financial Technologies Ltd – an active UK company (incorporated Feb. 2018) the document says has no social media presence and had its website recently taken down. Its most recent filed accounts reportedly show roughly £388,700 in assets against about £5.02 million in liabilities – net liabilities of roughly £4.63 million.
- International Digital Assets Exchange Ltd, trading as Interdax – a crypto derivatives platform (live 2019, dissolved January 2022) offering perpetual swaps with up to 100x leverage and “battle”-style trading competitions, marketed as non-KYC. The document alleges DAX was effectively a shell continuation of Interdax after the latter failed. Dixon reportedly served as Interdax’s Chief Marketing Officer.
The document argues Interdax and Rollbit share close parallels: both marketed high-leverage derivatives to a non-KYC “degen” trading audience, and Rollbit’s own leveraged derivatives product (launched May 2021, initially up to 1,000x) arrived shortly after Interdax went dark, using some of the same influencer promoters.
Interdax’s Marketing and Enforcement
The document says Interdax’s growth relied heavily on paying “Crypto Twitter” influencers a fixed amount of Bitcoin to promote the platform through referral links – a tactic it says Rollbit later replicated, “most notably through partnerships with high-profile influencers such as Gainzy.” It states that the two people who became Rollbit’s earliest Crypto Twitter promotional partners had previously been among Interdax’s most visible promoters, and – as Interdax’s Chief Marketing Officer – Dixon would have directly managed and paid those same influencers. The document is careful to note that neither of the two influencers is accused of wrongdoing themselves, and says it’s possible they didn’t know Interdax and Rollbit shared operators.
The document also alleges Interdax enforced its own rules selectively: it describes an influencer known as “BitBit Crypto” being banned for cheating during a trading competition, then reinstated once staff recognized his large following, while other users who engaged in similar conduct – or who had overtaken him on the leaderboard – remained banned. The document frames this as a template later echoed in Rollbit’s alleged pattern of enforcing restrictions against ordinary users while giving high-profile, promotionally valuable accounts a pass for similar conduct.
2016 CSGO Diamonds Scandal
The dossier’s central historical claim is that Dixon previously owned CSGO Diamonds, a Counter-Strike: Global Offensive skin-gambling site that collapsed in 2016. According to the document:
- Popular streamer m0E publicly alleged the site’s owner had fed him advance knowledge of roll outcomes so he could stage apparent live wins on stream, creating a false impression that winning was easy.
- m0E says he went public after a dispute over roughly $26,000 in unpaid sponsorship/revenue-share money; he was also reportedly paid 170 BTC as a severance package in June 2016 to end the partnership.
- CSGO Diamonds characterized the staged bets as “for entertainment purposes.” Valve subsequently sent cease-and-desist letters to CSGO Diamonds and numerous other skin-gambling operators, and the site shut down.
- The document alleges Rollbit copied CSGO Empire’s site design (via a hired former Empire designer) shortly before launch, while simultaneously running campaigns accusing Empire of stealing user funds – which the author frames as consistent with Dixon’s alleged conduct pattern.
- Both Rollbit’s public co-founder “Razer” and figures associated with the platform have denied any link to CSGO Diamonds, which the document characterizes as a “blatant lie.”
Other Named Individuals
- Peter Kerr Robertson – a Scottish former co-director of Dixon’s companies, said to own PKR Hosting Ltd, which the document alleges shifted from conventional web hosting into promoting CSGO Diamonds content (including big-win highlights) to a young audience. It also links PKR Hosting to a streamer called Sparkles, who allegedly promoted CSGO Diamonds and later became one of Rollbit’s earliest promotional partners (from April 2020). The document further alleges – based on circumstantial details including a shared Scottish accent and self-description – that Robertson later worked at Rollbit under the pseudonym “SmokeyLisa,” a high-authority community manager who allegedly personally conducted “additional KYC” Google Meet calls demanding to see users’ ID, bank statements and live wallet access (camera off, face never shown) before large balances were frozen or seized. SmokeyLisa reportedly left Rollbit in early 2024, briefly advised a project called Plus.Bet, and later co-founded Tanzanite, a crypto-casino certification service – which the document says briefly certified Rollbit before withdrawing the certification after public criticism. SmokeyLisa has denied any connection to CSGO Diamonds and, per the document, has publicly dismissed people who allege otherwise.
- Jose Llisterri – Interdax’s other co-founder alongside Dixon. The document states he has publicly and repeatedly denied any involvement with Rollbit or the “Razer” pseudonym, said he left Interdax on bad terms, has not spoken to Dixon since, and has acknowledged not knowing about Dixon’s alleged CSGO Diamonds history at the time.
- Illya Tyschenko – described as Interdax’s final CTO, who stayed on with Dixon after the rest of the team (including Llisterri) departed. The document speculates, without confirming, that Tyschenko could be “Razer” or otherwise have detailed knowledge of any Interdax-to-Rollbit transition, noting that Tyschenko’s later company, HPlus Consulting LLC (Orlando, Florida), offers crypto-exchange infrastructure the document says would suit a platform like Rollbit’s needs, and that he blocked the author on Telegram after being asked about Rollbit.
Fund-Seizure Practices
The bulk of the document catalogs user complaints that Rollbit freely allows deposits and play but imposes KYC hurdles, freezes, or account bans specifically when a user tries to withdraw a profit. Common justifications cited in the document include:
- Multi-accounting allegations, often raised, per the document, without evidence and only at withdrawal time.
- Restricted-region play – the document notes Rollbit maintains a long list of banned jurisdictions but, it claims, enforces this only on withdrawal, not at sign-up or during play, and argues this is inconsistent given that some Rollbit staff and promoted streamers are themselves based in listed restricted countries (UK, Scotland, elsewhere in Europe).
- AML/source-of-funds concerns, alleged to be invoked without supporting evidence and sometimes used to justify seizing funds outright rather than simply returning them to their origin.
- Allegations of “market abuse” or cheating, including on highly liquid markets like Premier League football odds, where the document argues individual manipulation is implausible.
- “Account in profit” cited, per the document, as grounds alone to treat a withdrawal dispute as resolved in Rollbit’s favor.
The document also describes users reporting “sarcastic,” dismissive, or delay-heavy support responses, and alleges support staff sometimes threatened to refer user data to law enforcement or pointed users toward Curaçao’s legal system, which the author frames as effectively unenforceable for ordinary users.
Cases Cited in the Document
- @Rov777 (X, June 2026): Alleges a roughly $200,000 balance was seized after weeks of blackjack play via VPN from a restricted region Rollbit had reportedly not previously flagged; the document says Rollbit co-founder “Razer” first cited region restrictions, then switched to alleging card counting and dealer collusion without publishing evidence.
- “yaling777” (Bitcointalk, March 2026): A user says roughly $4,000 was withheld after a sports-betting win, with Rollbit citing multi-accounting and money-laundering concerns without evidence.
- “bgmbet” (Bitcointalk, June 2025): Reports roughly $3,189 in USDC withheld after a profitable withdrawal, despite Level 3 KYC verification; account allegedly disabled over unproven multi-accounting claims.
- “Veselin10” (Bitcointalk, May 2025): Describes roughly $500 withheld, with the document alleging Rollbit cycled through multiple different justifications (multi-accounting, then AML, then sports-betting “abuse”) for the same case.
- @CryptoLaMa8 (X, 2025): Alleges roughly $35,000 in winnings forfeited under the restricted-region policy after being permitted to play from that region without issue.
- @anonadep (X, 2026): A long-term, Level 3-verified user with a reported $5.5 million lifetime wagering history says a roughly $29,000 sports withdrawal was frozen, with Rollbit later alleging multi-accounting (again without disclosed evidence) and ultimately suspending the account for a generic “Terms of Service” breach, allegedly beyond the 31-day investigation window in Rollbit’s own terms.
- “LucaNotBase” (July 2026): A German user says a $6,500 balance was seized over a regional restriction after being allowed to log in and play with no warning that his region had become restricted.
The document states additional cases – some reportedly involving sums “amounting to hundreds of thousands” – are still under private review and were not detailed publicly.
Other Allegations
- Ayezee “fake money” claims: The document alleges a streamer partnership in which a promoted streamer’s on-camera “real money” wins were funded via deposits from what looked like a “Binance account,” citing a third-party forum post making the same claim, and frames this as consistent with the earlier m0E/CSGO Diamonds pattern of misleading viewers about realistic gambling outcomes.
- Southampton FC sponsorship: Rollbit became Southampton’s front-of-shirt partner for the 2024/25 Premier League season. The document alleges Rollbit quietly launched a near-inactive Rollbit.co.uk site around the same time, speculating this was intended to deflect scrutiny of advertising an unlicensed offshore brand to a UK/Premier League audience.
- Alleged retaliation against critics: The document says Rollbit placed a $100,000 bounty for information on a long-time critic using the handle @FatManTerra after he raised concerns about Rollbit’s RLB token, and separately resurfaced old objectionable jokes by that critic in what the document frames as an attempt to discredit him.
Conclusion
The author argues the pattern traces an unbroken line from the 2016 CSGO Diamonds scandal through Interdax to Rollbit and, more recently, to a decentralized-casino project called Luck.io – which the document links to Dixon via timing, shared marketing tactics (influencer payments reportedly as high as $500,000/month), and reused promotional partners, despite Rollbit and Luckio both publicly stating Rollbit was only a passive investor. Luckio shut down in April 2026 without fully paying outstanding user reward balances. The document calls for Dixon, Robertson, and others named to be “held personally accountable,” while also noting that individuals like Jose Llisterri who have publicly and specifically denied involvement are treated separately from those the author believes remain implicated.
What Isn’t Verified
- The core identification of “Lucky” as Daniel Robert Dixon rests on unnamed industry sources and is described by the author as only “vaguely confirmed.”
- The identification of “SmokeyLisa” as Peter Kerr Robertson is circumstantial (shared nationality, accent, self-description) and explicitly acknowledged by the author as not certain.
- No regulatory finding, lawsuit, or court judgment establishing wrongdoing by Rollbit, Dixon, Robertson, or any other named individual is cited in the document.
- Several named individuals (Llisterri, SmokeyLisa) are quoted as having denied the allegations or the connections attributed to them; those denials are noted in the document but not independently adjudicated.
This report summarizes claims made in a single, anonymously authored document. None have been independently verified by courts, regulators, or news organizations. It should be read as a description of what that document alleges, not as confirmation that the allegations are true.
